MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393079459 · doi:10.1061/jpsea2.pseng-1605

Visualization and Analysis of Oil and Gas Pipeline Corrosion Research: A Bibliometric Data-Mining Approach

2024· article· en· W4393079459 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCorrosion Behavior and Inhibition
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVisualizationPipeline (software)Petroleum engineeringCorrosionData visualizationGas pipelineFossil fuelEngineeringPipeline transportData scienceComputer scienceForensic engineeringConstruction engineeringCivil engineeringEnvironmental scienceMining engineeringData miningEnvironmental engineeringWaste managementMetallurgyMaterials scienceMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The problem of corrosion in oil and gas pipelines is one of the major factors affecting the process safety and efficient sustainability development of the oil and gas industry. To gain a better understanding of global research trends and dynamics in the field of oil and gas pipeline corrosion and to advance the development of corrosion control technology, we conducted a literature review using a sample of 1,745 papers from the Web of Science (WOS) database published from 2002 to 2022. We employed a bibliometric analysis approach employed to investigate the distribution of publications over time, geographic regions, major organizations, major authors, journal cocitation, and literature cocitation, and to identify research hotspots and frontiers. The results revealed an exponential growth in the overall number of papers, with the most rapid increase occurring in the last 4 years. China, the US, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Brazil emerged as the most active countries in oil and natural gas pipeline corrosion research, and Mexico, Canada, and Australia also exhibited significant influence in the field. The journals Engineering Failure Analysis, Corrosion, and Corrosion Science had the highest number of publications and impact in this domain. Notably, Corrosion Science stood out as the most influential and highly regarded journal in the corrosion field. The fundamental theories and research framework in the realm of oil and natural gas pipeline corrosion have been primarily established, and a large number of research directions and frontier branches are emerging. The impact of flow parameters on corrosion, pipeline reliability assessment, and analysis of corrosion defects and failures are identified as the three main development paths in this field. In terms of research methodologies, machine learning techniques are becoming increasingly prevalent, with a growing number of studies adopting various machine learning methods. Among these methods, explainable deep learning is at the forefront of development in the field of oil and natural gas pipeline corrosion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.976
Threshold uncertainty score0.943

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0110.011
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.122
GPT teacher head0.392
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it