MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393084564 · doi:10.5755/j01.itc.53.1.34536

Dual Attention Aware Octave Convolution Network for Early-Stage Alzheimer's Disease Detection

2024· article· en· W4393084564 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInformation Technology And Control · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicBrain Tumor Detection and Classification
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceConvolution (computer science)Dual (grammatical number)Artificial intelligenceArtificial neural networkLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Some of the most fundamental human capabilities, including thought, speech, and movement, may be lost due to brain illnesses. The most prevalent form of dementia, Alzheimer's disease (AD), is caused by a steady decline in brain function and is now incurable. Despite the challenges associated with making a conclusive diagnosis of AD, the field has generally shifted toward making diagnoses justified by patient records and neurological analysis, such as MRI. Reports of studies utilizing machine learning for AD identification have increased in recent years. In this publication, we report the results of our most recent research. It details a deep learning-based, 3D brain MRI-based method for automated AD detection. As a result, deep learning models have become increasingly popular in recent years for analyzing medical images. To aid in detecting Alzheimer's disease at an initial phase, we suggest a dual attention-aware Octave convolution-based deep learning network (DACN). The three main parts of DACN are as follows: First, we use Patch Convolutional Neural Network (PCNN) to identify discriminative features within each MRI patch while simultaneously boosting the features of abnormally altered micro-structures in the brain; second, we use an Octave convolution to minimize the spatial redundancy and widen the field of perception of the brain's structure; and third, we use a dual attention aware convolution classifier to dissect the resulting depiction further. An outstanding test accuracy of 99.87% is reached for categorizing dementia phases by employing the suggested method in experiments on a publically available ADNI (Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative) dataset. The proposed model was more effective, efficient, and reliable than the state-of-the-art models through our comparisons.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.793
Threshold uncertainty score0.492

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it