MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393112045 · doi:10.1186/s40537-024-00898-6

Multi-sample $$\zeta $$-mixup: richer, more realistic synthetic samples from a p-series interpolant

2024· article· en· W4393112045 on OpenAlexafffund
Kumar Abhishek, Colin J. Brown, Ghassan Hamarneh

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal Of Big Data · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAlliance de recherche numérique du CanadaCompute CanadaSimon Fraser UniversityNvidia
KeywordsAlgorithmComputer scienceMachine learningArtificial intelligenceSeries (stratigraphy)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Modern deep learning training procedures rely on model regularization techniques such as data augmentation methods, which generate training samples that increase the diversity of data and richness of label information. A popular recent method,mixup, uses convex combinations of pairs of original samples to generate new samples. However, as we show in our experiments,mixup can produce undesirable synthetic samples, where the data is sampled off the manifold and can contain incorrect labels. We propose $$\zeta $$ ζ -mixup, a generalization ofmixup with provably and demonstrably desirable properties that allows convex combinations of $${T} \ge 2$$ T≥2 samples, leading to more realistic and diverse outputs that incorporate information from $${T}$$ T original samples by using ap-series interpolant. We show that, compared tomixup, $$\zeta $$ ζ -mixup better preserves the intrinsic dimensionality of the original datasets, which is a desirable property for training generalizable models. Furthermore, we show that our implementation of $$\zeta $$ ζ -mixup is faster thanmixup, and extensive evaluation on controlled synthetic and 26 diverse real-world natural and medical image classification datasets shows that $$\zeta $$ ζ -mixup outperformsmixup, CutMix, and traditional data augmentation techniques. The code will be released at https://github.com/kakumarabhishek/zeta-mixup .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.182
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.153 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal Of Big DataSame topicDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningFrench-language works237,207