A case study of whale optimization algorithm for scheduling in C2M model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the continuous upgrading of industrial technology and information technology, consumers can deeply participate in the whole life cycle of products and realize customized production. These unprecedented changes have brought consumers and manufacturers closer together, resulting in the intelligent business model of "Internet + Customized Production" and "Customer to Manufacturer (C2M)". C2M has been adopted by more and more companies. However, the transition from traditional business models to C2M is a problem that every company must face and solve. Personalized orders of many varieties and small lots put enormous pressure on the production of mainly labor-intensive electronic assembly companies. The theoretical findings of Industry 4.0 and Lean Manufacturing show that people play a central role in assembly operations. As an important element of the production system, worker scheduling has a direct impact on delivery time and cost. Worker scheduling requires not only matching people to jobs, but also considering flexible employment. According to the "Learning Curve" theory, workers with learning potential can continuously enrich their skills and work efficiency will show dynamic changes. Therefore, under the condition of shortest order delivery time and lowest cost, worker scheduling considering the learning effect becomes a challenge for enterprise decision makers. Firstly, the production method of manufacturing industry in C2M environment is studied. Then, based on single-skill task and multi-skill task, respectively, a learning curve-based model of dynamic change in worker skill level is constructed. And this model is used as the input of the assembly line worker scheduling model. Secondly, an Elite Non-dominant Sorting Whale Optimization Algorithm (ENS-WOA) is designed for this multi-objective optimization problem. The correctness and feasibility of the proposed algorithm are verified by selecting classical arithmetic cases for experimental comparison with other algorithms. Finally, the established worker efficiency change model, worker scheduling model and the proposed algorithm are applied to optimize the assembly line of water pump products of Company B, which is being transformed to C2M, and solved by MATLAB software. The results show that the model proposed in this paper is effective, stable and practical compared with the worker costs and delivery period required to complete the order in the original assembly line. Worker costs were reduced by 29.02% and orders were completed approximately 10 days earlier.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".