MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393121446 · doi:10.5267/j.ijiec.2024.2.002

A case study of whale optimization algorithm for scheduling in C2M model

2024· article· en· W4393121446 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicScheduling and Optimization Algorithms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWhaleScheduling (production processes)Optimization algorithmComputer scienceMathematical optimizationJob shop schedulingAlgorithmBusinessMathematicsFisheryComputer networkBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the continuous upgrading of industrial technology and information technology, consumers can deeply participate in the whole life cycle of products and realize customized production. These unprecedented changes have brought consumers and manufacturers closer together, resulting in the intelligent business model of "Internet + Customized Production" and "Customer to Manufacturer (C2M)". C2M has been adopted by more and more companies. However, the transition from traditional business models to C2M is a problem that every company must face and solve. Personalized orders of many varieties and small lots put enormous pressure on the production of mainly labor-intensive electronic assembly companies. The theoretical findings of Industry 4.0 and Lean Manufacturing show that people play a central role in assembly operations. As an important element of the production system, worker scheduling has a direct impact on delivery time and cost. Worker scheduling requires not only matching people to jobs, but also considering flexible employment. According to the "Learning Curve" theory, workers with learning potential can continuously enrich their skills and work efficiency will show dynamic changes. Therefore, under the condition of shortest order delivery time and lowest cost, worker scheduling considering the learning effect becomes a challenge for enterprise decision makers. Firstly, the production method of manufacturing industry in C2M environment is studied. Then, based on single-skill task and multi-skill task, respectively, a learning curve-based model of dynamic change in worker skill level is constructed. And this model is used as the input of the assembly line worker scheduling model. Secondly, an Elite Non-dominant Sorting Whale Optimization Algorithm (ENS-WOA) is designed for this multi-objective optimization problem. The correctness and feasibility of the proposed algorithm are verified by selecting classical arithmetic cases for experimental comparison with other algorithms. Finally, the established worker efficiency change model, worker scheduling model and the proposed algorithm are applied to optimize the assembly line of water pump products of Company B, which is being transformed to C2M, and solved by MATLAB software. The results show that the model proposed in this paper is effective, stable and practical compared with the worker costs and delivery period required to complete the order in the original assembly line. Worker costs were reduced by 29.02% and orders were completed approximately 10 days earlier.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.485
Threshold uncertainty score0.542

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it