MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393156220 · doi:10.1177/14759217241235637

Advanced deep learning framework for underwater object detection with multibeam forward-looking sonar

2024· article· en· W4393156220 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueStructural Health Monitoring · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicUnderwater Acoustics Research
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMinistry of Colleges and Universities
KeywordsSonarComputer scienceUnderwaterObject detectionArtificial intelligencePreprocessorConvolutional neural networkDeep learningComputer visionKey (lock)Feature (linguistics)Pattern recognition (psychology)Computer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Underwater object detection (UOD) is an essential activity in maintaining and monitoring underwater infrastructure, playing an important role in their efficient and low-risk asset management. In underwater environments, sonar, recognized for overcoming the limitations of optical imaging in low-light and turbid conditions, has increasingly gained popularity for UOD. However, due to the low resolution and limited foreground-background contrast in sonar images, existing sonar-based object detection algorithms still face challenges regarding precision and transferability. To solve these challenges, this article proposes an advanced deep learning framework for UOD that uses the data from multibeam forward-looking sonar. The framework is adapted from the network architecture of YOLOv7, one of the state-of-the-art vision-based object detection algorithms, by incorporating unique optimizations in three key aspects: data preprocessing, feature fusion, and loss functions. These improvements are extensively tested on a dedicated public dataset, showing superior object classification performance compared to the selected existing sonar-based methods. Through experiments conducted on an underwater remotely operated vehicle, the proposed framework validates significant enhancements in target classification, localization, and transfer learning capabilities. Since the engineering structures have similar geometric shapes to the objects tested in this study, the proposed framework presents potential applicability to underwater structural inspection and monitoring, and autonomous asset management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.841
Threshold uncertainty score0.696

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it