MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393158677 · doi:10.1609/aaai.v38i2.27839

Learning Generalized Medical Image Segmentation from Decoupled Feature Queries

2024· article· en· W4393158677 on OpenAlexaff
Qi Bi, Jingjun Yi, Hao Zheng, Wei Ji, Yawen Huang, Yuexiang Li, Yefeng Zheng

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage Retrieval and Classification Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFeature (linguistics)Artificial intelligenceSegmentationComputer scienceImage (mathematics)Pattern recognition (psychology)Computer visionImage segmentation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Domain generalized medical image segmentation requires models to learn from multiple source domains and generalize well to arbitrary unseen target domain. Such a task is both technically challenging and clinically practical, due to the domain shift problem (i.e., images are collected from different hospitals and scanners). Existing methods focused on either learning shape-invariant representation or reaching consensus among the source domains. An ideal generalized representation is supposed to show similar pattern responses within the same channel for cross-domain images. However, to deal with the significant distribution discrepancy, the network tends to capture similar patterns by multiple channels, while different cross-domain patterns are also allowed to rest in the same channel. To address this issue, we propose to leverage channel-wise decoupled deep features as queries. With the aid of cross-attention mechanism, the long-range dependency between deep and shallow features can be fully mined via self-attention and then guides the learning of generalized representation. Besides, a relaxed deep whitening transformation is proposed to learn channel-wise decoupled features in a feasible way. The proposed decoupled fea- ture query (DFQ) scheme can be seamlessly integrate into the Transformer segmentation model in an end-to-end manner. Extensive experiments show its state-of-the-art performance, notably outperforming the runner-up by 1.31% and 1.98% with DSC metric on generalized fundus and prostate benchmarks, respectively. Source code is available at https://github.com/BiQiWHU/DFQ.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial IntelligenceSame topicImage Retrieval and Classification TechniquesFrench-language works237,207