MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393169231 · doi:10.1016/j.imu.2024.101481

Predictive biomarker discovery in cancer using a unique AI model based on set theory

2024· article· en· W4393169231 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueInformatics in Medicine Unlocked · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMcGill University Health Centre
FundersMEDTEQ+
KeywordsBiomarker discoveryComputational biologySet (abstract data type)Computer scienceBiomarkerCancerArtificial intelligenceMachine learningBiologyProteomicsGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The current study applies a new artificial intelligence (AI) method, ALiX, which is based on interval arithmetic, to analyze and interpret biological data for a clinical problem: identification of biomarkers for cancer diagnosis. The key unique and important feature of this study is that ALiX provides an explanation to our clinical hypothesis in the form of a list of ranked protein biomarkers that identifies which biomarkers are the most significant drivers of the predicted outcome, a capability that is not currently available in other AI methods. Based on the significant drivers, this study identifies a machine learning model and solution for stratifying cancer patients into subtypes that will predict response to treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.435
Threshold uncertainty score0.871

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.370
Teacher spread0.341 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it