Noninvasive Measurement of Three-Phase Currents
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents a noninvasive method of measuring three-phase currents using magnetic sensors that can be used for continuous monitoring, automation, and protection of power grids. The non-intrusive nature of these sensors gives operational and economic benefits in installing them at the existing distributed generation sites, and power substations. These sensors are linear in operation, free of saturation, and need minimum-duration or no outage for installation as compared to the conventional current transformers. The paper describes magnetic field simulation, calibration, and experimental validation of magnetic sensors for accurate measurement of three-phase currents. Laboratory experiment results of three-phase low current measurements for two types of overhead structures: triangular and horizontal are rendered as a validation of the proposition. The performance verification of these sensors is further achieved by conducting field experiments for measuring currents up to 1500A. The sensors yield promising results with a maximum error of 1.15% in estimation of three-phase currents. The magnetic sensors showed a satisfactory performance in accurately reproducing current waveforms consisting of fundamental frequency and harmonics that are typically present in modern power grids.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it