Study on detecting main ingredients of silicone rubber based on terahertz spectrum
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The authors investigated the ingredient detection technique of silicone rubber based on the Terahertz spectrum. For this purpose, 18 diverse high‐temperature vulcanised silicone rubber (HTVSR) formulations were customised, 8 of which are used as calibration set while the rest 10 as prediction set. Based on the Beer‐Lambert Law, the partial‐least‐square (PLS) regression model and the least‐squares support‐vector machines (LS‐SVM) regression model were used to yield the relationships between the absorption spectrums and the content percentages of polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), alumina trihydrate (ATH), and silica in HTVSR. The results showed that for the formulations tested, the prediction accuracy of all three main ingredients by the PLS regression model could be improved by changing the spectrum range from 0.2–4 to 0.5–2 THz. If the data were pre‐processed by the Savitzky–Golay smoothing method or multiplicative scatter correction method, the prediction accuracy of PDMS could be further enhanced. However, this would lead to a slight decrease in the prediction accuracy of ATH. For the LS‐SVM regression model, the radial basis function (RBF) kernel and the linear kernel were studied. It was found that the prediction accuracy of both kernels was better than that of the PLS regression model. With the LS‐SVM regression model using the RBF kernel, the correlated coefficients of PDMS and ATH in the prediction set could be up to 0.9915 and 0.9742, respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".