Minimizing Voltage Ripple of a DC Microgrid via a Particle-Swarm-Optimization-Based Fuzzy Controller
Bibliographic record
Abstract
DC microgrids play a crucial role in both industrial and residential applications. This study focuses on minimizing output voltage ripple in a DC microgrid, including power supply resources, a stochastic load, a ballast load, and a stabilizer. The solar cell serves as the power supply, and the stochastic load represents customer demand, whereas the ballast load includes a load to safeguard the boost circuits against the overvoltage in no-load periods. The stabilizer integrates components such as electrical vehicle batteries for energy storage and controlling long-time ripples, supercapacitors for controlling transient ripples, and an over-voltage discharge mechanism to prevent overcharging in the storage. To optimize the charging and discharging for batteries and supercapacitors, a multi-objective cost function is defined, consisting of two parts—one for ripple minimization and the other for reducing battery usage. The battery charge and discharge are considered in the objective function to limit its usage during transient periods, providing a mechanism to rely on the supercapacitor and protect the battery. Particle swarm optimization is employed to fine-tune the fuzzy membership function. Various operational scenarios are designed to showcase the DC microgrid’s functionality under different conditions, including scenarios where production exceeds and falls below consumption. The study demonstrates the improved performance and efficiency achieved by integrating a PSO-based fuzzy controller to minimize voltage ripple in a DC microgrid and reduce battery wear. Results indicate a 42% enhancement in the integral of absolute error of battery current with our proposed PSO-based fuzzy controller compared to a conventional fuzzy controller and a 78% improvement compared to a PI controller. This translates to a respective reduction in battery activity by 42% and 78%.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".