MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393340489 · doi:10.1016/j.gca.2024.03.030

Indium partitioning between silicate melts and magmatic fluids: implications for indium ore genesis and the tracing of magma degassing

2024· article· en· W4393340489 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueGeochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicExtraction and Separation Processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaCanada Foundation for InnovationOntario Research Foundation
KeywordsSilicateIndiumMagmaGeologyGeochemistryTracingIgneous differentiationMineralogyPetrologyIgneous rockMaterials scienceVolcanoChemistryMetallurgyComputer scienceOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Most of the global indium resources are from deposits associated with felsic rocks . Considering that the indium concentration in the average upper crust is extremely low, magmatic-hydrothermal processes play a critical role in the enrichment and mineralization of indium. However, the extraction efficiency of indium by magmatic fluids remains unclear. We performed experiments at 800 °C, 150 MPa and oxygen fugacity of Ni-NiO buffer to determine the partition coefficient of indium between aqueous fluids and granitic melts ( D In f / m ). To counteract the rapid loss of indium into the noble metal container wall, the D In f / m were obtained by the method of local equilibrium between microscopic-sized fluid bubbles and surrounding silicate melt . The results show that indium has the highest fluid-melt partition coefficients of all metals investigated so far. At a constant aluminum saturation index (ASI = 1.07–1.12), D In f / m correlates linearly with the total Cl concentration in the coexisting fluid ( m Cl total ), increasing from 61 ± 11 (1σ) at m Cl total = 1.0 mol/kg H 2 O to 895 ± 105 (1σ) at m Cl total = 16 mol/kg H 2 O. When the HCl concentration in the solution increases from 0.13 to 0.49 mol/kg H 2 O at a fixed m Cl total = 2 mol/kg H 2 O, D In f / m increases parabolically from 129 ± 21 to 320 ± 24. The observed partitioning data suggest that indium was dominantly present as In(OH) 2 Cl in the low-HCl and In(OH)Cl 2 in high-HCl aqueous fluid at the experimental conditions. Numerical modeling indicates that the extraction efficiency of indium from S-type felsic magmas is very high (>85 %) and magmatic fluids may be the major source of indium for most indium deposits. Due to the high D In f / m values, fluid saturation and exsolution result in a sharp drop of indium concentration in both the residual melt and crystallized minerals, which makes the indium concentration in whole rock and minerals an indicator of fluid exsolution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.509
Threshold uncertainty score0.732

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it