Toward Generating a New Cloud-Based Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) Dataset and Cloud Intrusion Traffic Characterization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The distributed denial of service attack poses a significant threat to network security. Despite the availability of various methods for detecting DDoS attacks, the challenge remains in creating real-time detectors with minimal computational overhead. Additionally, the effectiveness of new detection methods depends heavily on well-constructed datasets. This paper addresses the critical DDoS dataset creation and evaluation domain, focusing on the cloud network. After conducting an in-depth analysis of 16 publicly available datasets, this research identifies 15 shortcomings across various dimensions, emphasizing the need for a new approach to dataset creation. Building upon this understanding, this paper introduces a new public DDoS dataset named BCCC-cPacket-Cloud-DDoS-2024. This dataset is meticulously crafted, addressing challenges identified in previous datasets through a cloud infrastructure featuring over eight benign user activities and 17 DDoS attack scenarios. Also, a Benign User Profiler (BUP) tool has been designed and developed to generate benign user network traffic based on a normal user behavior profile. We manually label the dataset and extract over 300 features from the network and transport layers of the traffic flows using NTLFlowLyzer. The experimental phase involves identifying an optimal feature set using three distinct algorithms: ANOVA, information gain, and extra tree. Finally, this paper proposes a multi-layered DDoS detection model and evaluates its performance using the generated dataset to cover the main issues of the traditional approaches.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".