MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393353234 · doi:10.3390/en17071665

Using Deep Learning to Detect Anomalies in On-Load Tap Changer Based on Vibro-Acoustic Signal Features

2024· article· en· W4393353234 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergies · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMechanical Failure Analysis and Simulation
Canadian institutionsHydro-QuébecUniversité du Québec à Chicoutimi
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaHydro-Québec
KeywordsTap changerSIGNAL (programming language)Computer scienceArtificial intelligenceAcousticsSpeech recognitionPattern recognition (psychology)EngineeringElectrical engineeringPhysicsVoltageTransformer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An On-Load Tap Changer (OLTC) that regulates transformer voltage is one of the most important and strategic components of a transformer. Detecting faults in this component at early stages is, therefore, crucial to prevent transformer outages. In recent years, Hydro Quebec initiated a project to monitor the OLTC’s condition in power transformers using vibro-acoustic signals. A data acquisition system has been installed on real OLTCs, which has been continuously measuring their generated vibration signal envelopes over the past few years. In this work, the multivariate deep autoencoder, a reconstruction-based method for unsupervised anomaly detection, is employed to analyze the vibration signal envelopes generated by the OLTC and detect abnormal behaviors. The model is trained using a dataset obtained from the normal operating conditions of the transformer to learn patterns. Subsequently, kernel density estimation (KDE), a nonparametric method, is used to fit the reconstruction errors (regarding normal data) obtained from the trained model and to calculate the anomaly scores, along with the static threshold. Finally, anomalies are detected using a deep autoencoder, KDE, and a dynamic threshold. It should be noted that the input variables responsible for anomalies are also identified based on the value of the reconstruction error and standard deviation. The proposed method is applied to six different real datasets to detect anomalies using two distinct approaches: individually on each dataset and by comparing all six datasets. The results indicate that the proposed method can detect anomalies at an early stage. Also, three alarms, including ignorable anomalies, long-term changes, and significant alterations, were introduced to quantify the OLTC’s condition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.075
Threshold uncertainty score0.545

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it