Deep Generative Adversarial Reinforcement Learning for Semi-Supervised Segmentation of Low-Contrast and Small Objects in Medical Images
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Deep reinforcement learning (DRL) has demonstrated impressive performance in medical image segmentation, particularly for low-contrast and small medical objects. However, current DRL-based segmentation methods face limitations due to the optimization of error propagation in two separate stages and the need for a significant amount of labeled data. In this paper, we propose a novel deep generative adversarial reinforcement learning (DGARL) approach that, for the first time, enables end-to-end semi-supervised medical image segmentation in the DRL domain. DGARL ingeniously establishes a pipeline that integrates DRL and generative adversarial networks (GANs) to optimize both detection and segmentation tasks holistically while mutually enhancing each other. Specifically, DGARL introduces two innovative components to facilitate this integration in semi-supervised settings. First, a task-joint GAN with two discriminators links the detection results to the GAN's segmentation performance evaluation, allowing simultaneous joint evaluation and feedback. This ensures that DRL and GAN can be directly optimized based on each other's results. Second, a bidirectional exploration DRL integrates backward exploration and forward exploration to ensure the DRL agent explores the correct direction when forward exploration is disabled due to lack of explicit rewards. This mitigates the issue of unlabeled data being unable to provide rewards and rendering DRL unexplorable. Comprehensive experiments on three generalization datasets, comprising a total of 640 patients, demonstrate that our novel DGARL achieves 85.02% Dice and improves at least 1.91% for brain tumors, achieves 73.18% Dice and improves at least 4.28% for liver tumors, and achieves 70.85% Dice and improves at least 2.73% for pancreas compared to the ten most recent advanced methods, our results attest to the superiority of DGARL. Code is available at GitHub.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it