MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394004161 · doi:10.53555/sfs.v8i3.2441

Investigation into Factors Influencing Employee Retention Among IT Professionals: A Perspective from India

2022· article· en· W4394004161 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Survey in Fisheries Sciences · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicAI and HR Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPerspective (graphical)Employee retentionBusinessPsychologyPublic relationsMarketingPolitical scienceComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Employee retention poses a significant challenge for IT organizations in India, where skilled professionals are in high demand both domestically and internationally. The departure of technocrats in pursuit of better opportunities threatens the stability and productivity of these organizations, particularly in the face of economic uncertainty and fierce competition. To address this issue, effective retention strategies are crucial. This study adopts a holistic approach to investigate the factors influencing employee turnover in Indian IT and multinational companies, as perceived by HR managers. The research aims to identify the reasons for employee attrition, factors contributing to retention, attitudes toward work, work relationships, and basic expectations from the organization. Furthermore, the study seeks to determine if there are any significant differences in responses between IT professionals employed in Indian IT companies versus multinational corporations. Analyzing data collected from 30 IT professionals, the study found no significant difference in responses between these types of companies. However, differences were observed based on certain demographic factors such as total experience, position, and participation in sponsored certification programs. The findings of this study are expected to assist HR managers in developing tailored retention strategies to mitigate attrition rates within their respective organizations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.101
Threshold uncertainty score0.989

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.003
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.162
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.118 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it