MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394004161 · doi:10.53555/sfs.v8i3.2441

Investigation into Factors Influencing Employee Retention Among IT Professionals: A Perspective from India

2022· article· en· W4394004161 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mr. K.K. Bajaj

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Survey in Fisheries Sciences · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicAI and HR Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPerspective (graphical)Employee retentionBusinessPsychologyPublic relationsMarketingPolitical scienceComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Employee retention poses a significant challenge for IT organizations in India, where skilled professionals are in high demand both domestically and internationally. The departure of technocrats in pursuit of better opportunities threatens the stability and productivity of these organizations, particularly in the face of economic uncertainty and fierce competition. To address this issue, effective retention strategies are crucial. This study adopts a holistic approach to investigate the factors influencing employee turnover in Indian IT and multinational companies, as perceived by HR managers. The research aims to identify the reasons for employee attrition, factors contributing to retention, attitudes toward work, work relationships, and basic expectations from the organization. Furthermore, the study seeks to determine if there are any significant differences in responses between IT professionals employed in Indian IT companies versus multinational corporations. Analyzing data collected from 30 IT professionals, the study found no significant difference in responses between these types of companies. However, differences were observed based on certain demographic factors such as total experience, position, and participation in sponsored certification programs. The findings of this study are expected to assist HR managers in developing tailored retention strategies to mitigate attrition rates within their respective organizations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.074

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.162
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.118 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Survey in Fisheries SciencesSame topicAI and HR TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207