MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394577701 · doi:10.11647/obp.0373.24

The Copper Supply Gap

2024· book-chapter· en· W4394577701 on OpenAlexaff
Erik Eberhardt

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Book Publishers · 2024
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicExtraction and Separation Processes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCopperEnvironmental scienceMaterials scienceMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Copper is a critical metal for electrification, and is witnessing a step-change in demand associated with the transition away from fossil fuels to clean energy and electric transportation systems. By 2030, a copper supply gap of ten million metric tons per year is expected, equivalent to the global copper supply required to meet the Paris Agreement targets. This essay discusses the challenges ahead as we seek to close this anticipated supply gap, with a particular focus on the need for new underground mining methods to access deeper copper deposits. The shift to targeting deep underground deposits is pushing the mining industry beyond its experience base, creating a need for novel engineering approaches to mitigate new geological hazards, while also managing new economic risk factors. Success in these endeavours is critical to the advancement of the clean energy transition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.050
Threshold uncertainty score0.167

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0060.007
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0500.018

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Book PublishersSame topicExtraction and Separation ProcessesFrench-language works237,207