Deep Reinforcement Learning-Based Robust Design for an IRS-Assisted MISO-NOMA System
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we propose a robust design for an intelligent reflecting surface (IRS)-assisted multiple-input single output non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) system. By considering channel uncertainties, the original robust design problem is formulated as a sum-rate maximization problem under a set of constraints. In particular, the uncertainties associated with reflected channels through IRS elements and direct channels are taken into account in the design and they are modelled as bounded errors. However, the original robust problem is not jointly convex in terms of beamformers at the base station and phase shifts of IRS elements. Therefore, we reformulate the original robust design as a reinforcement learning problem and develop an algorithm based on the twin-delayed deep deterministic policy gradient agent (also known as TD3). In particular, the proposed algorithm solves the original problem by jointly designing the beamformers and the phase shifts, which is not possible with conventional optimization techniques. Numerical results are provided to validate the effectiveness and evaluate the performance of the proposed robust design. In particular, the results demonstrate the competitive and promising capabilities of the proposed robust algorithm, which achieves significant gains in terms of robustness and system sum-rates over the baseline deep deterministic policy gradient agent. In addition, the algorithm has the ability to deal with fixed and dynamic channels, which gives deep reinforcement learning methods an edge over hand-crafted convex optimization-based algorithms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".