MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394728591 · doi:10.1021/acsestengg.3c00515

Evaluation of a Porous Membrane as a Mass-Transfer Efficient Structure for the Adsorption of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances from Drinking Water

2024· article· en· W4394728591 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueACS ES&T Engineering · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPer- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersDivision of Chemical, Bioengineering, Environmental, and Transport Systems
KeywordsAdsorptionMass transferPorosityChemical engineeringChemistryMembraneWater transferEnvironmental chemistryChromatographyEnvironmental scienceWater resource managementOrganic chemistryEngineeringBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With drinking water regulations forthcoming for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), the need for cost-effective treatment technologies has become urgent. Adsorption is a key process for removing or concentrating PFAS from water; however, conventional adsorbents operated in packed beds suffer from mass transfer limitations. The objective of this study was to assess the mass transfer performance of a porous polyamide adsorptive membrane for removing PFAS from drinking water under varying conditions. We conducted batch equilibrium and dynamic adsorption experiments for perfluorooctanesulfonic acid, perfluorooctanoic acid, perfluorobutanesulfonic acid, and undecafluoro-2-methyl-3-oxahexanoic acid (i.e., GenX). We assessed various operating and water quality parameters, including flow rate (pore velocity), pH, ionic strength (IS), and presence of dissolved organic carbon. Outcomes revealed that the porous adsorptive membrane was a mass transfer-efficient platform capable of achieving dynamic capacities similar to equilibrium capacities at fast interstitial velocities. The adsorption mechanism of PFAS to the membrane was a mixture of electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions, with pH and IS controlling which interaction was dominant. The adsorption capacity of the membrane was limited by its surface area, but its site density was approximately five times higher than that of granular activated carbon. With advances in molecular engineering to increase the capacity, porous adsorptive membranes are well suited as alternative adsorbent platforms for removing PFAS from drinking water.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.186
Threshold uncertainty score0.574

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it