Examining the moderating role of data literacy in the relationship between human resource analytics and employee innovative behavior
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The practical application of business data analytics in human resource (HR) management activities is still limited and underutilized. The primary reason for this is the requirement for more analytical skills, which can be acquired through data literacy. These skills are necessary to ensure obtaining the potential benefits of human resource analytics linked to desired positive employee outcomes, such as fostering innovative behavior. To address this issue, this quantitative study has been conducted to delve into the prospective moderating role of data literacy in the interaction between human resource analytics and employees’ innovative behavior. The core objective of this study is to examine whether human resource professionals’ data literacy level significantly impacts the correlation between human resource analytics and the inclination of employees towards innovative behavior. A sample of 250 HR specialists from large companies in Jordan has been used to address this inquiry. A correlational-predictive design has been used in this study. Regression analysis using the SPSS macro-PROCESS software has been utilized to address the study hypotheses. The study reveals a positive connection between HR analytics and employees’ innovative behavior. Moreover, it uncovers a noteworthy moderating influence of data literacy on this association. These findings suggest that heightened data analysis proficiency among HR professionals amplifies the potential benefits derived from analytics, thereby enhancing employees’ innovative capabilities. As a result, the research suggests that companies upgrade their technical infrastructure for HR functions and concurrently utilize data analytics for informed HR decisions. Further, these insights do serve as necessary inputs in understanding HR analytics and their implications for prudent business strategy. In view of this dynamic nature of HR analytics, the contributions made by the study are immensely valuable; hence, further exploration is needed to fill in gaps within existing knowledge.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.015 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".