Centralized smart energy monitoring system for legacy home appliances
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The increasing global population and reliance on electrical devices for daily life resulted in sharply rising energy consumption. Also, this leads to higher household electricity bills. As a result, there is a growing demand for energy monitoring systems that can accurately estimate energy usage to help save power, especially for older home appliances that are difficult or expensive to update with monitoring sensors. However, current energy monitoring systems have some drawbacks, such as the inability to detect different types of appliances and the deployment complexity. Moreover, such systems are too costly to use in older power infrastructures. To address this issue, we proposed a centralized smart energy monitoring system designed for legacy home appliances, aiming to address the limitations of current energy monitoring systems by avoiding costly infrastructure upgrades to calculate the power consumption of legacy home appliances. The proposed system employs a two-layered architecture comprising hardware (Emontx device, Analog-to-Digital Converters (ADC), and Current Transformer (CT) sensors) and a software layer that includes Artificial Intelligence (AI) predictors using a pre-defined set of rules and K Nearest Neighbours (KNN) algorithms. We conducted three experiments on real home appliances to evaluate the proposed work. The accuracy of the proposed system showed positive results after several modifications and hard tuning of several parameters in devices, specifically for Jordanian power plants.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".