MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4395007958 · doi:10.2118/218272-ms

Polymer Flooding: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly - Lessons Learned from Field Practices

2024· article· en· W4395007958 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Improved Oil Recovery Conference · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlooding (psychology)Field (mathematics)Computer sciencePsychologyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract It has been over 40 years since the publication of an early paper titled 'Polymer Flooding, Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow' in the Journal of Petroleum Technology (Chang, 1978). Significant progress has been achieved since then, with successful commercial-scale applications in China (Daqing, Shengli, Xinjiang, Henan, and Bohai Bay offshore), Canada (Pelican Lake and Brintnell), India (Mangala), Oman (Marmul), the UK North Sea (Captain), and the USA (Yates, Vacuum, and Milne Point) since then. However, global polymer flooding (PF) production remains below expectations by the industry, particularly in the US (NPC, 1976 and 1984). The objective of this paper is to share our analyses and lessons learned to encourage more commercial-scale applications of PF worldwide. This paper reviews basic concepts, screening criteria, and mechanisms of polymer flooding and analyzes historical PF field activities from the early 1960s through 2023. It then presents reasons for the lower-than-forecast productions. Conventional wisdom holds that low crude oil prices are the roadblock to the commercialization of all chemical flooding. However, our analysis suggests that this is not the case, and there are other reasons for the lower-than-forecast results. Based on the progress made over the decades, we divide PF into three stages: the exploration stage from 1960 through 1980, the development stage from 1981 through 2000, and the commercialization stage from 2001 through 2023, including nine major commercial-scale polymer flooding projects worldwide. We analyzed key factors that impacted PF technology over the years, including the critical amount of polymer used, the impact of reservoir heterogeneity on-field performance, the issue of ineffective polymer recycling, the reversal of injection profile, injectivity and productivity problems, and difficulties in treating produced fluids. After these analyses, we propose a set of design criteria, including reservoir evaluation, polymer selection and slug design, laboratory and simulation studies, pre-commercial field tests, and surveillance/monitoring programs to ensure commercial success. We suggest areas for improvement in future operations, such as enhanced PF combined with other technologies. Future applications of polymer flooding in high-temperature and high-salinity, heavy oil, and carbonate reservoirs are also discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.938
Threshold uncertainty score0.985

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it