MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4395017560 · doi:10.1109/trs.2024.3392439

Toward Land Vehicle Ego-Velocity Estimation Using Deep Learning and Automotive Radars

2024· article· en· W4395017560 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Radar Systems · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAutonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of CanadaQueen's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsId, ego and super-egoAutomotive industryComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceAcousticsRemote sensingEngineeringGeographyAerospace engineeringPsychologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a deep learning framework for the estimation of land vehicle ego-velocity using Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave (FMCW) automotive radars, addressing the challenges of data sparsity and noise without the need for extrinsic radar calibration. By structuring radar scans into image-based and voxel-based networks, our approach demonstrates robust ego-velocity estimation across multiple sensor configurations and orientations. Experimental results from three distinct datasets—RadarScenes, NavINST, and MSC-RAD4R—validate the framework’s effectiveness, showing superior performance over traditional methods. The models’ adaptability to various sensor specifications and their computational efficiency highlight their potential for real-time applications. We made our implementation open-source at: https://github.com/paaraujo/deep-ego-velocity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.804
Threshold uncertainty score0.764

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it