XGBoost algorithm based estimation of near surface mounted FRP rod-to-concrete bond strength and failure mode
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Using fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) in reinforced concrete (RC) structures can mitigate the colossal repair costs due to reinforcing steel corrosion. Hence, FRP rod/bar is gaining wider applications in diverse RC structures as a partial or full replacement for steel rebar. The FRP rod-to-concrete interfacial bond is pivotal in transferring stresses from concrete to FRP rods. This study develops a novel prediction model to estimate the near surface mounted FRP rod-to-concrete bond strength as well as the failure type using five machine learning (ML) algorithms, namely, linear regression, decision tree, gradient boosting tree, random forest, and extreme gradient boosting (XGB). The performance of the developed models was compared with that of four bond strength design guidelines and one analytical model. A database comprising 416 experimental datasets was constructed and used for model training and validation. Based on statistical performance metrics, the precision of the XGB algorithm was superior to that of the other ML models, design guidelines, and analytical model. Feature importance analysis based on the SHapley Additive exPlanations theory and partial dependence plot was performed. The results show that the bond length had the most significant influence on the bond strength, followed by the tensile strength of the FRP composite, diameter of the FRP rod, compressive strength of concrete, and elastic modulus of the FRP composite. A graphical user interface was developed and offers a user friendly, free access, and simple tool for estimating the bond strength and failure type of FRP rods in concrete.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it