MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4395447763 · doi:10.1163/22141332-11020007-03

The Reform of Christian Doctrine in the Catechisms of Peter Canisius, written by Thomas Flowers, S.J.

2024· article· en· W4395447763 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Jesuit Studies · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicReformation and Early Modern Christianity
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGermanConfession (law)EnlightenmentChristianityModernityHistoriographyDoctrineChurch historyEmpirePhilosophyArgument (complex analysis)HistoryPietyLiteratureLawReligious studiesTheologyEpistemologyAncient historyPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Catholicism itself.Yet, as their presence conditioned the confessionalization of German life until the Enlightenment, their suppression (until 1814) and subsequent very gradual reappearance diminished their significance in the crucial first half of nineteenth century modernizing.Holzem's massive account is a tour de force-not only a cogent account of Christianity's adaptation to modernity in a new German nation and empire but also an amazingly useful compilation of individual stories and episodes.That emphasis adds to his argument about the importance of "typologies of sanctification"-forms of individual piety crafted within each confession.Without going deeply into some of the arguments (necessitating another fifteen hundred words!), one can safely argue that Andreas Holzem's contribution will crystallize and shape the historiographical debate over German Christianity for decades to come.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.457
Threshold uncertainty score0.198

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it