Increasing schedule reliability in the multiple depot vehicle scheduling problem with stochastic travel time
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The multiple depot vehicle scheduling problem (MDVSP) is one of the most studied problems in public transport service planning. It consists of assigning buses to each timetabled trip while respecting vehicle availability at each depot. Although service quality, and especially reliability, is the core of most transport agencies, the MDVSP is more often than not solved solely in a cost-efficient way. This work introduces a data-driven model to the reliable MDVSP with stochastic travel time (R-MDVSP-STT). The reliability of a schedule is assessed and accounted for by propagating delays using the probability mass function of the travel time of each timetabled trip. We propose a heuristic branch-and-price algorithm to solve this problem and a labeling algorithm with a stochastic dominance criterion for the associated subproblems. The solutions obtained are compared based on three metrics - under normal and extraordinary circumstances. Computational results on real-life instances show that our method can efficiently find good trade-offs between operational costs and reliability, improving the reliability of the solutions with little cost increase.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".