Meteorological Analysis and Damage Survey Study of the Impact of Hurricane Elsa in Barbados
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hurricane Elsa was the first hurricane to impact the island of Barbados in more than 60 years. Global warming is expected to increase the number of intense hurricanes in the Atlantic Ocean, which present a greater risk of future devastating hurricane impacts on the island. This study investigates the meteorological conditions and rapid intensification of Elsa between June 27 and July 3, 2021, by using meteorological data sets and results from the Weather Research and Forecasting model. The study also uses damage assessment data to analyze wind damage caused to residential homes as Elsa passed over Barbados on July 2. Unusually warm sea surface temperatures for June/early July, and a strong North Atlantic Subtropical High that was positioned anomalously close to the Caribbean islands, contributed to Elsa’s rapid intensification and its track across the Atlantic, respectively. It was also found that most reported damages on the island involved the complete or partial removal of roofs and were concentrated in and around the capital city Bridgetown, which is most likely due to the high concentration of poorly constructed houses in this area. Therefore, there is a need to improve the building codes of houses to ensure that they withstand strong hurricane winds. It was recommended that the implementation of a mandatory building code in addition to the provision of subsidies for low-income persons to improve their homes could aid with this issue. Furthermore, the paper highlights deficiencies in weather models in predicting the genesis and rapid intensification of Elsa, which highlights a need for improvements.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".