Paradigms and Practical Realities of the Social Economy
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The study aims to assess the theoretical foundations and practical realities of the social economy around the world.To achieve a common goal, the study focused on solving three problems: first, to substantiate modern identification and institutional recognition of the social economy on a global scale; second, to explain the general context and historical evolution of the process that contributed to the creation of a favorable political framework in the form of a social economy, highlighting its ecosystem, values and characteristics; thirdly, to determine the weight of the social economy in different countries of the world in market conditions, using external audit.The main subjects of the assessment are associations, social enterprises, and non-profit, public, and volunteer organizations.The study analyzed theoretical paradigms, evolution, and balanced practical implementation in different countries.The results confirmed that the social economy has the potential to create and maintain jobs, improve the quality of life, and reduce income inequality, regardless of the country's economic profile.In the European Union, the social economy is actively spreading through social enterprises and innovations.In the United States, this process involves associations and foundations.In the Russian Federation, the social economy develops through non-profit organizations.The findings deepen the understanding of the social economy and its relevance.In addition, the results provide information to politicians on social justice and sustainable development.Therefore, the study can serve as the basis for programs aimed at supporting socially oriented organizations and enterprises.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it