MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396242229 · doi:10.3390/drones8050173

VizNav: A Modular Off-Policy Deep Reinforcement Learning Framework for Vision-Based Autonomous UAV Navigation in 3D Dynamic Environments

2024· article· en· W4396242229 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueDrones · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicRobotic Path Planning Algorithms
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsReinforcement learningModular designComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceComputer visionHuman–computer interaction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) provide benefits through eco-friendliness, cost-effectiveness, and reduction of human risk. Deep reinforcement learning (DRL) is widely used for autonomous UAV navigation; however, current techniques often oversimplify the environment or impose movement restrictions. Additionally, most vision-based systems lack precise depth perception, while range finders provide a limited environmental overview, and LiDAR is energy-intensive. To address these challenges, this paper proposes VizNav, a modular DRL-based framework for autonomous UAV navigation in dynamic 3D environments without imposing conventional mobility constraints. VizNav incorporates the Twin Delayed Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient (TD3) algorithm with Prioritized Experience Replay and Importance Sampling (PER) to improve performance in continuous action spaces and mitigate overestimations. Additionally, VizNav employs depth map images (DMIs) to enhance visual navigation by accurately estimating objects’ depth information, thereby improving obstacle avoidance. Empirical results show that VizNav, by leveraging TD3, improves navigation, and the inclusion of PER and DMI further boosts performance. Furthermore, the deployment of VizNav across various experimental settings confirms its flexibility and adaptability. The framework’s architecture separates the agent’s learning from the training process, facilitating integration with various DRL algorithms, simulation environments, and reward functions. This modularity creates a potential to influence RL simulation in various autonomous navigation systems, including robotics control and autonomous vehicles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.654
Threshold uncertainty score0.817

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it