MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396528587 · doi:10.22215/etd/2023-15958

Characterization of Building Integrated Phase Change Materials Using Experiments and Simulation

2023· dissertation· en· W4396528587 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Calene Baylis

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEnergy and Environmental Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCharacterization (materials science)Phase changePhase (matter)Materials scienceComputer scienceEngineeringNanotechnologyEngineering physicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Phase change materials (PCMs) are a latent thermal storage solution which passively store energy, such as solar energy, and delay its release into a space, reducing peak cooling loads in summer and prolonging passive heating in winter. PCMs are most effective when their melting temperatures are near the room temperature setpoint. In locations with two distinct conditioning seasons and thus two different setpoints throughout the year, two PCMs may be optimal for reducing both conditioning loads. However, research on these optimizations remains limited. The objective of this research was to expand the knowledge of buildings with PCM, such as two PCMs of different melting temperatures to optimize for two space conditioning seasons. This was achieved through thermophysical property experiments and single room modelling to predict trends in PCM performance, full-scale in-situ experiments, and full house modelling across Canada and the United States. For the in-situ experiments, two chambers with interior dimensions of 2.4 m by 2.4 m by 2.4 m were designed, constructed, and commissioned to experimentally compare a dual PCM wallboard to a reference-case room without PCM. The PCMs decreased the heating and cooling loads by 14.5% and 12.0%, respectively, from January until July 2023 in Ottawa, Canada. Full house modelling was conducted using EnergyPlus, and the time of use implications of PCMs were assessed both economically and in terms of the carbon emissions. The PCMs reduced space heating loads throughout the night, but due to the low space cooling load, the peak emissions and economic reductions were relatively small. The modelling analysis was expanded across Canada and the United States on four house archetypes to quantify the energy, emissions, and economics associated with PCM. In moderate and warm locations, greater space conditioning reductions occurred with a single PCM, whereas in highly heating dominant locations, two PCMs with different melting temperatures provided greater benefits. The emissions payback period was as low as 0.3 years, due to the reductions in space heating and cooling loads. The results suggest significant promise for PCMs in reducing the carbon footprint associated with building space conditioning, particularly for emissions intensive space conditioning systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.098
GPT teacher head0.405
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEnergy and Environmental SystemsFrench-language works237,207