MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396552233 · doi:10.1504/ijcnds.2024.138217

An objective comparison of two prominent virtual actor frameworks: Proto.Actor and Orleans

2024· article· en· W4396552233 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Communication Networks and Distributed Systems · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDigital Games and Media
Canadian institutionsSheridan College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceHuman–computer interactionVirtual actorData scienceCognitive scienceVirtual reality

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recently there has been a significant increase in developing distributed systems easily and rapidly. Driven by the demand of software communities, developers seek tools and frameworks that abstract away low-level details of the underlying distributed system and the need to understand complex details on how the system works. Researchers have explored serverless frameworks, distributed key value stores, distributed stream processing frameworks and distributed actor frameworks. Currently, stateful serverless applications and distributed actor models may be the answer to what developers need. In this paper, we present a review of stateful distributed computing frameworks, and the results of experiments that compare Orleans and Proto.Actor - two popular actor model frameworks - running on Kubernetes. We discovered that the Proto.Actor performs at least two times faster than Orleans, but is more complex to learn. We present the results of these tests, and provide a discussion of future research opportunities highlighting virtual actor model frameworks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.578
Threshold uncertainty score0.469

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.347 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it