Dynamic hierarchical intrusion detection task offloading in IoT edge networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The Internet of Things (IoT) has gained widespread importance in recent time. However, the related issues of security and privacy persist in such IoT networks. Owing to device limitations in terms of computational power and storage, standard protection approaches cannot be deployed. In this article, we propose a lightweight distributed intrusion detection system (IDS) framework, called FCAFE‐BNET (Fog based Context Aware Feature Extraction using BranchyNET). The proposed FCAFE‐BNET approach considers versatile network conditions, such as varying bandwidths and data loads, while allocating inference tasks to cloud/edge resources. FCAFE‐BNET is able to adjust to dynamic network conditions. This can be advantageous for applications with particular quality of service requirements, such as video streaming or real‐time communication, ensuring a steady and reliable performance. Early exit deep neural networks (DNNs) have been employed for faster inference generation at the edge. Often, the weights that the model learns in the initial layer may be sufficiently qualified to perform the required classification tasks. Instead of using subsequent layers of DNNs for generating the inference, we have employed the early‐exit mechanism in the DNNs. Such DNNs help to predict a wide range of testing samples through these early‐exit branches, upon crossing a threshold. This method maintains the confidence values corresponding to the inference. Employing this approach, we achieved a faster inference, with significantly high accuracy. Comparative studies exploit manual feature extraction techniques, that can potentially overlook certain valuable patterns, thus degrading classification performance. The proposed framework converts textual/tabular data into 2‐D images, allowing the DNN model to autonomously learns its own features. This conversion scheme facilitated the identification of various intrusion types, ranging from 5 to 14 different categories. FCAFE‐BNET works for both network‐based and host‐based IDS: NIDS and HIDS. Our experiments demonstrate that, in comparison with recent approaches, FCAFE‐BNET achieves a 39.12%–50.23% reduction in the total inference time on benchmark real‐world datasets, such as: NSL‐KDD, UNSW‐NB 15, ToN_IoT, and ADFA_LD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".