Performance Enhanced Secure Spatial Keyword Similarity Query With Arbitrary Spatial Ranges
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The increasing prevalence of cloud computing drives the exploration of various secure query schemes over encrypted data, among which secure spatial keyword query has drawn a great deal of attention due to its broad application in location-based services. However, most existing schemes are either limited to the boolean keyword test or incapable of protecting access pattern privacy. Although the state-of-the-art secure spatial keyword query scheme can support keyword similarity while preserving access pattern privacy, it is unable to cope with the arbitrary spatial range, which is more general, and has limitations in efficiency and security. In this paper, we propose a new secure spatial keyword similarity query scheme that can support arbitrary spatial ranges and enhance the efficiency and security of the state-of-the-art scheme at the same time. Specifically, we first present a new homomorphic encryption technique by improving the popular symmetric homomorphic encryption (SHE). After that, we propose a novel approach to make supporting arbitrary spatial ranges over encrypted data possible, in which a spatial encoding technique is designed to improve performance. Finally, by designing a pack-based solution to protect access pattern privacy, our proposed scheme can hide the number of query results while optimizing performance. We formally prove the security of our proposed scheme and conduct experiments to evaluate its performance. The results indicate that our proposed scheme outperforms the state-of-the-art scheme in both the computational costs and communication overhead.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".