MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396579327 · doi:10.3847/2515-5172/ad454d

Exogenous Carbon is Unlikely to be the Source of Methane Microseepage Emissions on Mars

2024· article· en· W4396579327 on OpenAlexfundno aff
John E. Moores, H. M. Sapers, Andrew C. Schuerger

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Notes of the AAS · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPlanetary Science and Exploration
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMars Exploration ProgramMethaneEnvironmental scienceCarbon fibersGreenhouse gasAstrobiologyMethane emissionsAtmospheric sciencesEcologyPhysicsMaterials scienceBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A complete understanding of methane in the atmosphere of Mars requires information on putative sources. Organic carbon derived from meteoritic sources, such as interplanetary dust particles (IDPs), over geologic time is the best-defined source of organic carbon on the surface of Mars. Here we examine two different mechanisms for degrading this material to produce methane (1) Ultraviolet photolysis and (2) thermal decomposition. Neither of these mechanisms can produce sufficient methane under realistic assumptions to explain observed methane at Gale Crater, suggesting that IDPs are not the primary source material producing methane on Mars.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.112
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch Notes of the AASSame topicPlanetary Science and ExplorationFrench-language works237,207