MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396581718 · doi:10.1504/ijsse.2024.138345

Adaptive artefact canceller filter based on penguins search optimisation algorithm for ECG signals

2024· article· en· W4396581718 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of System of Systems Engineering · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicECG Monitoring and Analysis
Canadian institutionsHorizon College and Seminary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdaptive filterFilter (signal processing)Computer scienceAlgorithmSpeech recognitionElectronic engineeringEngineeringArtificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)Computer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The electrocardiogram (ECG) signal is a collection of biopotentials related to the contractions of heart muscles that is used to diagnose cardiac abnormalities. The ECG signal is usually distorted by unwanted interference called noise or artefact. The removal of such noise is crucial to better analysis of ECG signals and to better evaluation of the human cardiac system. So, in this paper, an enhanced adaptive artefact canceller (AAC) is presented for filtering the ECG signals. The PeSOA algorithm is used to optimise the weight parameters of AAC. The performance of the proposed PeSOA is evaluated in terms of mean square error (MSE), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), normalised mean square error (NRMSE), correlation, and coherence factor. Besides, the performance of the proposed scheme is compared with that of different existing filtering techniques, such as bacterial foraging optimisation-based AAC (BFOAAC) and AAC. This proposed noise canceller method supports the human cardiac system for analysing the ECG signals preciously.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.952
Threshold uncertainty score0.478

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it