Contribution of new and chronic cortical lesions to disability accrual in multiple sclerosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Cortical lesions are common in multiple sclerosis and are associated with disability and progressive disease. We asked whether cortical lesions continue to form in people with stable white matter lesions and whether the association of cortical lesions with worsening disability relates to pre-existing or new cortical lesions. Fifty adults with multiple sclerosis and no new white matter lesions in the year prior to enrolment (33 relapsing-remitting and 17 progressive) and a comparison group of nine adults who had formed at least one new white matter lesion in the year prior to enrolment (active relapsing-remitting) were evaluated annually with 7 tesla (T) brain MRI and 3T brain and spine MRI for 2 years, with clinical assessments for 3 years. Cortical lesions and paramagnetic rim lesions were identified on 7T images. Seven total cortical lesions formed in 3/30 individuals in the stable relapsing-remitting group (median 0, range 0–5), four total cortical lesions formed in 4/17 individuals in the progressive group (median 0, range 0–1), and 16 cortical lesions formed in 5/9 individuals in the active relapsing-remitting group (median 1, range 0–10, stable relapsing-remitting versus progressive versus active relapsing-remitting P = 0.006). New cortical lesions were not associated with greater change in any individual disability measure or in a composite measure of disability worsening (worsening Expanded Disability Status Scale or 9-hole peg test or 25-foot timed walk). Individuals with at least three paramagnetic rim lesions had a greater increase in cortical lesion volume over time (median 16 µl, range −61 to 215 versus median 1 µl, range −24 to 184, P = 0.007), but change in lesion volume was not associated with disability change. Baseline cortical lesion volume was higher in people with worsening disability (median 1010 µl, range 13–9888 versus median 267 µl, range 0–3539, P = 0.001, adjusted for age and sex) and in individuals with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis who subsequently transitioned to secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (median 2183 µl, range 270–9888 versus median 321 µl, range 0–6392 in those who remained relapsing-remitting, P = 0.01, adjusted for age and sex). Baseline white matter lesion volume was not associated with worsening disability or transition from relapsing-remitting to secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. Cortical lesion formation is rare in people with stable white matter lesions, even in those with worsening disability. Cortical but not white matter lesion burden predicts disability worsening, suggesting that disability progression is related to long-term effects of cortical lesions that form early in the disease, rather than to ongoing cortical lesion formation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".