Application of AdaBound-Optimized XGBoost-LSTM Model for Consumer Credit Assessment in Banking Industries
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Consumer credit assessment has always been a crucial concern in the financial industry. It involves evaluating an individual's credit history and their ability to repay loans, playing a pivotal role in the risk management and lending decisions made by credit institutions. In the present landscape, traditional credit assessment methods confront various shortcomings. Firstly, they typically only consider static features and are unable to capture the dynamic changes in an individual's credit profile over time. Secondly, traditional methods struggle with processing complex time series data, failing to fully exploit the importance of time-related information. To address these challenges, we propose an innovative solution – the XGBoost-LSTM model optimized with the AdaBound algorithm. This hybrid model combines two powerful machine learning techniques, XGBoost and LSTM, to leverage both static and dynamic features effectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it