MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396680560 · doi:10.1109/lwc.2024.3397081

Near-Field ISAC: Beamforming for Multi-Target Detection

2024· article· en· W4396680560 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Wireless Communications Letters · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBeamformingComputer scienceBase stationTransmitter power outputBenchmark (surveying)Electronic engineeringReal-time computingTelecommunicationsEngineeringTransmitter

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article develops multi-target detection in near-field (NF) integrated sensing and communication (ISAC) systems. Specifically, the base station (BS) operates in full-duplex mode to sense the environmental information from the targets while communicating with the users. To minimize BS transmit power and to satisfy communication and sensing rate targets, we design optimal transmit beamforming (for communication and sensing) and reception beamforming at the BS. We develop an iterative beamforming algorithm to solve the resulting non-convex optimization problem. Compared to the traditional far-field benchmark, the proposed NF approach with 255 BS transmit and reception antennas uses ~1118(or ~6m) less BS transmit power to satisfy the required rate requirements. Furthermore, our proposed approach provides precise multi-target location estimates, emphasizing the advantages of NF sensing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.897
Threshold uncertainty score0.606

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it