MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396680753 · doi:10.1109/tase.2024.3395471

Linearized Data Center Workload and Cooling Management

2024· article· en· W4396680753 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed and Parallel Computing Systems
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsData centerWorkloadCenter (category theory)Computer scienceEngineeringSimulationOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the current high levels of energy consumption of data centers, reducing power consumption by even a small percentage is beneficial. We propose a framework for thermal-aware workload distribution in a data center to reduce cooling power consumption. The framework includes linearization of the general optimization problem and proposing a heuristic to approximate the solution for the resulting Mixed Integer Linear Programming (MILP) problems. We first define a general nonlinear power optimization problem including several cooling parameters, heat recirculation effects, and constraints on server temperatures. We propose to study a linearized version of the problem, which is easier to analyze. As an energy saving scenario and as a proof of concept for our approach, we also consider the possibility that the red-line temperature for idle servers is higher than that for busy servers. For the resulting MILP problem, we propose a heuristic for intelligent rounding of the fractional solution. Through numerical simulations, we compare our heuristics with several existing algorithms. In addition, we evaluate the performance of the solution of the linearized system on the original system. Finally, the results show that the proposed approach can reduce the cooling power consumption by more than 10 percent compared to the case of continuous utilizations and a single red-line temperature. <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Note to Practitioners</i> —We present a holistic approach for thermal-aware workload distribution for power consumption reduction in data centers. We suggest that when thermal and power consumption models can be linearized, a model-independent approach can be used for optimization purposes. The standard linear problem that results presents some technical challenges to solve, for which we present intuitive and effective solution heuristics. The heuristics are simple enough that they could be used for real-time calculations. The result is that customized models and problems can be avoided (a linear model could be directly constructed from operational data, if available), allowing for the simplification of operational control problems. Our approach is evaluated for a high-fidelity model of a real data center, where both the linearization and optimization components are validated. Finally, we show how this approach can be used to effectively solve the operational problem of workload distribution in the presence of utilization-dependent server red-line temperatures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.977
Threshold uncertainty score0.793

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it