Linearized Data Center Workload and Cooling Management
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the current high levels of energy consumption of data centers, reducing power consumption by even a small percentage is beneficial. We propose a framework for thermal-aware workload distribution in a data center to reduce cooling power consumption. The framework includes linearization of the general optimization problem and proposing a heuristic to approximate the solution for the resulting Mixed Integer Linear Programming (MILP) problems. We first define a general nonlinear power optimization problem including several cooling parameters, heat recirculation effects, and constraints on server temperatures. We propose to study a linearized version of the problem, which is easier to analyze. As an energy saving scenario and as a proof of concept for our approach, we also consider the possibility that the red-line temperature for idle servers is higher than that for busy servers. For the resulting MILP problem, we propose a heuristic for intelligent rounding of the fractional solution. Through numerical simulations, we compare our heuristics with several existing algorithms. In addition, we evaluate the performance of the solution of the linearized system on the original system. Finally, the results show that the proposed approach can reduce the cooling power consumption by more than 10 percent compared to the case of continuous utilizations and a single red-line temperature.Note to Practitioners—We present a holistic approach for thermal-aware workload distribution for power consumption reduction in data centers. We suggest that when thermal and power consumption models can be linearized, a model-independent approach can be used for optimization purposes. The standard linear problem that results presents some technical challenges to solve, for which we present intuitive and effective solution heuristics. The heuristics are simple enough that they could be used for real-time calculations. The result is that customized models and problems can be avoided (a linear model could be directly constructed from operational data, if available), allowing for the simplification of operational control problems. Our approach is evaluated for a high-fidelity model of a real data center, where both the linearization and optimization components are validated. Finally, we show how this approach can be used to effectively solve the operational problem of workload distribution in the presence of utilization-dependent server red-line temperatures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".