MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396709180 · doi:10.1145/3629527.3651845

Analyzing Performance Variability in Alibaba's Microservice Architecture: A Critical-Path-Based Perspective

2024· article· en· W4396709180 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware System Performance and Reliability
Canadian institutionsBrock University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceCritical path methodMicroservicesPerspective (graphical)Identification (biology)Distributed computingService (business)Path (computing)ArchitectureData scienceArtificial intelligenceComputer networkCloud computingSystems engineeringEngineeringOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In large-scale microservice architectures, such as those utilized by Alibaba, identifying and addressing performance bottlenecks is a significant challenge due to the complicated interactions between thousands of services. To navigate this challenge, we have developed a critical-path-based technique aimed at analyzing microservice interactions within these complex systems. This technique facilitates the identification of critical nodes where service requests experience the longest delays. Our contribution is the discovery of performance variability in service interactions' response times within these critical paths, and pinpointing specific interactions within the system that show a high degree of performance variability. This improves the ability to detect service performance issues and their root causes allowing for dynamic adjustment in data collection detail, and targets critical interactions for adaptive monitoring.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.925
Threshold uncertainty score0.770

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it