MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396716948 · doi:10.1145/3748815

A Massively Parallel Performance Portable Free-Space Spectral Poisson Solver

2025· preprint· en· W4396716948 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueACM Transactions on Mathematical Software · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicElectromagnetic Scattering and Analysis
Canadian institutionsE-One Moli Energy (Canada)
FundersOak Ridge National LaboratoryOffice of ScienceNational Supercomputing Centre SingaporeCentro Svizzero di Calcolo ScientificoPaul Scherrer InstitutNational Energy Research Scientific Computing CenterChina Scholarship CouncilU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsMassively parallelParallel computingComputer scienceSpace (punctuation)SolverPoisson distributionComputational scienceMathematicsOperating systemStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vico et al. suggest a fast algorithm for computing volume potentials, beneficial to fields with problems requiring the solution of the free-space Poisson’s equation, such as beam and plasma physics. Currently, the standard is the algorithm of Hockney and Eastwood, with second order in convergence at best. The algorithm proposed by Vico et al. converges spectrally for sufficiently smooth functions, i.e., faster than any fixed order in the number of grid points. We implement a performance portable version of the traditional Hockney-Eastwood and the novel Vico-Greengard Poisson solver as part of the Independent Parallel Particle Layer (IPPL) library. For sufficiently smooth source functions, the Vico-Greengard algorithm achieves higher accuracy than the Hockney-Eastwood method with the same grid size, reducing the computational demands of high-resolution simulations since one could use coarser grids to achieve them. Additionally, we propose an improvement to the Vico-Greengard method which further reduces its memory footprint. This is important for GPUs, which have limited memory, and should be taken into account when selecting numerical algorithms for performance portable codes. Finally, we showcase performance through GPU and CPU scaling studies on the Perlmutter (NERSC) supercomputer, with efficiencies staying above 50% in the strong scaling case. To showcase portability, we also run the scaling studies on the Alps supercomputer at CSCS, Switzerland and the GPU partition of the Lumi supercomputer at CSC, Finland.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.966
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it