MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396768210 · doi:10.1016/j.slast.2024.100139

Importance of computed tomography perfusion on assessing collateral circulation and prognosis of patients with acute anterior circulation large vessel occlusion after endovascular therapy

2024· article· en· W4396768210 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lei Chen, Guangjun Bian, Xiufang Zhu, Xinxiu Duan, Yue Meng, Lei Li

Bibliographic record

VenueSLAS TECHNOLOGY · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCollateral circulationMedicineComputed tomography angiographyPerfusionRadiologyReceiver operating characteristicOcclusionAngiographyPerfusion scanningComputed tomographyModified Rankin ScaleInternal medicineNuclear medicineIschemiaIschemic stroke

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study probed the importance of computed tomography perfusion (CTP) on assessing collateral circulation and prognosis in patients with acute anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (AAC-LVO) after endovascular therapy (EVT). Retrospective analysis was performed on the case data of 124 AAC-LVO patients who achieved EVT in the First People's Hospital of Lianyungang. All patients received computed tomography (CT) examination. Based on the multi-phase computed tomography angiography (mCTA) score, patients were separated into poor collateral circulation group and good collateral circulation group. Based on modified Rankin scale (mRS) score, patients were separated into good prognosis group and poor prognosis group. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to measure the efficacy of CTP parameters in predicting good collateral circulation or good prognosis. Correlation between CTP parameters with mCTA collateral and 90-day mRS circulation score was analyzed using the Spearman correlation analysis. The age and admission national Institutes of Health stroke scale (NIHSS) scores of the good collateral circulation group were lower than the poor collateral circulation group, and low perfusion area volume with Tmax > 6 s (V Tmax>6s ), infarct core area volume (V CBF<30% )and hypoperfusion intensity ratio (HIR) were also lower. The mCTA collateral cycle score was negatively related to V Tmax>6 s , V CBF<30% and HIR. The area under the curve (AUC) values of V Tmax>6 s and V CBF<30% and HIR for predicting good collateral circulation were 0.763, 0.884 and 0.842, respectively, which suggested that perfusion parameters V Tmax>6 s , V CBF<30% and HIR could effectively indicate the status of patients' collateral circulation. Relative to the poor prognosis group, patients in the good prognosis group possessed lower admission NIHSS score, younger age, smaller final infarct volume, lower HIR, V CBF<30% , V Tmax>6s , Alberta Stroke Program Early CT(ASPECT) score, and higher mCTA score. Spearman correlation analysis unveiled that ASPECT score, mCTA score and 90-day mRS were negatively correlated. The final infarct volume, perfusion parameters HIR and V CBF<30% were positively correlated with 90-day mRS. ROC analysis showed that all variates had good prognostic value for acute anterior circulation great vessel occlusion patients, while V CBF<30% and HIR had high diagnostic value for prognosis. To sum up, CTP can provide a comprehensive imaging assessment of the collateral circulation of patients with AAC-LVO and has a higher predictive value for the prognosis assessment of patients with EVT in terms of V CBF<30% , HIR score and mCTA collateral circulation score.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSLAS TECHNOLOGYSame topicAcute Ischemic Stroke ManagementFrench-language works237,207