MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396863784 · doi:10.1007/s13753-024-00559-5

Promoting Older Adults’ Engagement in Disaster Settings: An Introduction to the Special Issue

2024· article· en· W4396863784 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Disaster Risk Science · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicGeriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryDalhousie University
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of CanadaDalhousie University
KeywordsPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Globally, surging extreme events and the escalating aging population present ongoing and severe challenges to the full spectrum of international community development (for example, social, health, and economic) (Dee 2024 ). Over the past 20 years, climate-induced and environmental disasters worldwide have caused over 1.3 million casualties and left more than 4.4 billion people injured, homeless, and/or in need of emergency assistance, with total direct economic losses approaching USD 3 trillion (UNDRR 2018 ). The rising human and economic costs have compelled international communities to prioritize resilience enhancement. Furthermore, the United Nations (UN 2019 ) reported that the global population of adults aged 65 and older will almost double from 9% in 2019 to 16% in 2050. Some countries, such as Greece, Korea, and Japan, have an even faster aging rate than the global average (World Economic Forum 2020 ).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.531
Threshold uncertainty score0.638

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.383
Teacher spread0.366 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it