MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396893912 · doi:10.1353/imp.2024.a927448

Eighteenth-Century Ukraine: New Perspectives on Social, Cultural, and Intellectual History ed. by Frank Sysyn et al. (review)

2024· article· en· W4396893912 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAb imperio · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCentral European and Russian historical studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCultural historyIntellectual historySociologyHistoryAnthropologyArt historyEconomic history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Eighteenth-Century Ukraine: New Perspectives on Social, Cultural, and Intellectual History ed. by Frank Sysyn et al. Lucien Frary (bio) Frank Sysyn, Volodymyr Sklokin, Zenon E. Kohut, and Larysa Bilous (Eds.), Eighteenth-Century Ukraine: New Perspectives on Social, Cultural, and Intellectual History (Montreal, Edmonton: McGill-Queen's University Press and the Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies Press, 2023). 648 pp., ill. Index. ISBN: 978-0-2280-1699-1. This timely volume features recent trends in the historiography of eighteenth-century Ukraine. The distinguished editors bring together twenty specialists (mostly in English translation) in a state-of-the-subject compendium on military and political history, society and identity, religion and culture, demographics and disease. The collection stirs debate about the periodization (deemed "always provisional") of this pivotal moment in Eurasian history and provides new perspectives for the comparative study of empire generally. Sharply argued and often innovative, these studies suggest that the time is right for a comprehensive synthesis of early modern Ukrainian history.1 In the introduction, the editors review the topics and sources engaging researchers of eighteenth-century Ukraine, especially since the end of the Soviet Union. Highlighting recent advances in scholarship, they divide the book into four parts: "Cossack Autonomies and Their Demise," "Society, Economy, and Demographics," "Church, Culture, and Education," and "Political and Historical Thought," each containing several concise, well-documented chapters. Geographic knowledge of the Eurasian steppe expanded with the clash of empires and resulted [End Page 187] in the production of maps. Kyrylo Halushko begins the volume with an expert summary of the cartographic work done by travelers who helped situate "the country of the Cossacks" as a politonym on maps of Europe. Maps served as tools of administrative integration, propaganda and legitimacy, and the next chapter, by Volodymyr Kravchenko, explores the "peculiar East-Slavic terminological labyrinth" (P. 58) that constitutes the symbolic geography of the Russian empire. Kravchenko demonstrates the fluidity and instability that characterize both Ukrainian self-identity and the place of Ukraine on the mental maps of educated Russians. As the Russian state advanced, the elite sought symbols to adorn its edifice. Oleksii Tolochko reports on the discovery of Kyiv as a center of archaeological pilgrimage (dubbed both the "Russian Jerusalem" and the "Slavic Pompeii") and historical consciousness among the people of "Rus'," "Great Russia," "New Russia," "Little Russia," and "Ukraine." Empire-building required Empress Catherine II to innovate when dealing with the Sloboda and those in charge of it. Volodymyr Sklokin charts the activity of Evdokim Shcherbinin, the leader of an "enlightened" commission that portrayed the abolition of Ukraine's autonomy as a civilizing act. Shcherbinin employed rhetoric that appealed to the "people" and sought their approval for protection from corrupt Cossack starshyna and clergy. The fluid movement of armies and populations during the era facilitated the spread of disease. The outbreak of bubonic plague in 1770–1771 in Kyiv provides the setting for Oksana Mykhed's chapter on border security and medical reforms: the problems unleashed by the plague actually helped catalyze the centralization and integration of new territories and people. Although the history of bureaucracy may seem colorless, Oleksandr Pankieiev draws on archival material to show how the stationing of hundreds of local officials in steppe Ukraine led to the creation of a permanent, loyal class of individuals willing to support and strengthen the Russian Empire on the ground. Vadym Adadurov concludes the first section with a contribution on Napoleon's Russian campaign, which reveals the remarkable loyalty toward tsarist Russia (and animosity toward pro-French Poland) of the nobility and commoners of the Little Russian gubernia. Romanticized portraits of chivalrous heroes on horseback notwithstanding, the freewheeling lifestyle of the Cossacks became legendary at this time. Hetmanate politics provides the focus of Viktor Horobets's archival-rich chapter on the efforts of St. Petersburg to regulate the democratic traditions of the Cossack military and the complex [End Page 188] interplay between ordinary soldiers, townspeople, and starshyna during the free elections of military fellows (tovarystvo). Next, Oleksii Sokyrko investigates the controversial Hetmancy of Kyrylo Rozumovs'kyi, whose sweeping military reforms promoted fighting efficiency while localizing identity and incorporating officers into a Malorossian Table of Ranks. A companion piece...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Direct model labels (unvalidated)

Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.

Model armCategoriesStudy designConfidence
gemmano category
Domain: not available · Genre: Review
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Not applicablehigh
gptno category
Domain: not available · Genre: Review
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Not applicablehigh
models agreeAgreement compares identical category sets and study designs across arms.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it