MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4397006666 · doi:10.1353/gsr.2024.a927868

Colonial Geography: Race and Space in German East Africa, 1884–1905 by Matthew Unangst (review)

2024· article· en· W4397006666 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueGerman Studies Review · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGlobal Maritime and Colonial Histories
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRace (biology)ColonialismGermanSpace (punctuation)GeographyEthnologyEconomic geographyAnthropologyHistoryGender studiesSociologyArchaeologyLinguisticsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Colonial Geography: Race and Space in German East Africa, 1884–1905 by Matthew Unangst Peter Ogunniran Colonial Geography: Race and Space in German East Africa, 1884–1905. By Matthew Unangst. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2022. Pp. xiii + 335. Hardcover $85.00. ISBN 9781487543402. As scholars continue to pay attention to German colonial history and legacy, historian Matthew Unangst's Colonial Geography has offered a brilliant understanding of the German colonial past in East Africa (Ostafrika). Focusing on the latter part of the nineteenth century until the early twentieth century, Unangst shows various attempts by Germany to transform the colony based on its changing conceptions of race and space from 1884 to 1905. To trace these changes, Unangst draws from critical geography that highlights the connection between the conception of space and economic changes and carefully examines pertinent primary sources: colonial propaganda, maps, (un)published writings of explorers and travelers, and public discussions of German colonial endeavors in the region. He argues that German colonizers shifted from the assumption that possessing and cultivating Ostafrika's land sufficed to make it German to the belief that the only way to transform the land and "Germanize" it was by reshaping its people (4). These shifting colonial models of land and race became the first German state project that used race to manage territory. The first chapter foregrounds the thesis and explains key concepts, while each chapter traces these changing colonial models. Unangst shows how African actors—different African ethnic groups, Africans on the coast, those in the hinterlands, Arabs, and Indians—made space on terms outside German control as these actors reshaped German projects to other ends, arguing that African spatial imaginaries intersected and influenced German spatial politics in twenty years of German presence in the colony. The second chapter discusses the precolonial spatialities of Ostafrika among the societies in the interior and along the coast when Germans encountered the colony, arguing and showing that scientific explorers portrayed East African societies and landscapes as reminiscent of Europe's past, by repurposing complex spatial representations developed long before Europeans' arrival. The information German explorers built upon to conceptualize the colonial space also depended on African intermediaries who influenced where the Europeans went and what they saw. He [End Page 341] then examines the introduction of a land-based approach to colonization by German colonial agents such as Carl Peters and the Society for German Colonization as they carried out expeditions aiming to acquire land through treaties with the local rulers. The colonial agents envisioned East African rulers as vassals to a new German king and erroneously believed that economic development was feasible simply by applying German political rule. Unangst offers intricate details about the signing of the treaties, showing that they were faulty from the onset; they ignored the typical standards of European treaties and were bound to impact German colonial policies. The next three chapters show the various debates and disagreements over colonial tactics after Germany took over. The disagreement among missionaries, the Foreign Office, colonial administrators, and agents revolved around the reasons for underdevelopment and the ways to transform the colonial subjects and the territory to extract profit through labor. To gain control over the coast, narratives of African landscapes evolving to resemble Germany and changing to deliver economic benefits were created, thus normalizing German sovereignty in all parts of East Africa as a part of the natural progress of history. The tension between race and space, however, continued when Germany confronted its first major colonial crisis. Unangst shows how the Abushiri War (1888–1889), among other issues, transformed East Africa into a site of conflict among civilizations, namely between European Christianity and Oriental Islam, birthing a pan-European struggle against Islamic authority in Africa. The creation of a narrative of humanitarian duty to protect Africans from the Arab slave trade, Carl Peters's expedition to rescue his compatriot Emin Pascha, and the deployment of the military against the Abushiri War became an extended race for political mobilization and German spatial expansion. Unangst argues that in the 1890s, the colonial policy on Ostafrika's future to simultaneously yield profits and improve the living conditions of Africans changed again. Administrators...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.061
Threshold uncertainty score0.931

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it