MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4397048536 · doi:10.1681/asn.20233411s1823c

Serum FGF23 and Urinary Neutrophil Gelatinase-Associated Lipocalin (NGAL) Correlation with Glomerular Filtration Rate, Measured with a Reference Technique in Children with CKD

2023· article· en· W4397048536 on OpenAlexaff
Atessa Bahadori, Carole Salomon, Cyril Jaksic, Christophe Combescure, Alexandra Wilhelm-Bals, Paloma Parvex

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Society of Nephrology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBiomedical Research and Pathophysiology
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalinRenal functionLipocalinUrinary systemMedicineInternal medicineUrologyEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Prognosis of chronic kidney disease (CKD) is closely related to early diagnosis and initiation of nephroprotective measures. Current kidney injury biomarkers are suboptimal for predicting kidney disease progression. Fibroblast Growth Factor 23 (FGF23) is well described as an early marker that increases proportionally to worsening CKD stages in adults. Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) is known to increase early after acute kidney injury, as a marker of AKI severity, however, it has not been validated as an early marker in CKD. The aim of this study is to investigate the association between FGF23, NGAL and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in children and evaluate their role in ascertaining moderate to severe CKD. Methods: Children aged 5 to 20 years old requiring kidney function assessment following primary nephropathy, solid organ transplantation or secondary nephropathy were recruited prospectively in a tertiary hospital of Switzerland for a reference measure of their GFR, with simultaneous measurement of plasma FGF23 and urinary NGAL. Results: 123 clearances were analyzed, in children mostly post solid organ transplantation (46%) or with primary nephropathy (37%). 42% had stage I CKD, 40% had stage II CKD and 12% had stage III or IV CKD. FGF23 was significantly higher in stage III or IV CKD (mean: 282.02 UI/ml ± 174.71) compared to stage I (mean: 143.76 UI/ml ± 178.61 ; p<0.001) or stage II (mean: 104.61 UI/ml ± 63.52; p<0.001). The area under the ROC curve for FGF23 to discriminate CKD stages I-II versus III-IV was 0.864 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.780-0.947). NGAL values were more elevated in stage III or IV CKD (mean: 103.65 UI/ml ± 129.43) compared to stage I (mean: 36.19 UI/ml ± 100.36 ; p=0.016) or stage II (mean: 44.86 UI/ml ± 104.66; p=0.082). The area under the ROC curve for NGAL to discriminate CKD stages I-II versus III-IV was 0.688 (95% CI: 0.512-0.864). Conclusions: FGF23 is significantly associated with decreasing GFR in children and discriminates for the presence of moderate to severe CKD in children. NGAL was not as strongly associated to decreasing GFR. Further studies are needed to evaluate FGF23 and NGAL as markers of CKD progression.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Society of NephrologySame topicBiomedical Research and PathophysiologyFrench-language works237,207