MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4398152819 · doi:10.1109/tbdata.2024.3403383

Harnessing the Power of Local Supervision in Federated Learning

2024· article· en· W4398152819 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Big Data · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducational Curriculum and Learning Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer sciencePower (physics)Data science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Federated learning is widely accepted as a privacy-preserving paradigm for training a shared global model across multiple client devices in a collaborative fashion. However, in practice, the significantly limited computational power on client devices has been a major barrier when we wish to train large models with potentially hundreds of millions of parameters. In this paper, we propose a new architecture, referred to as <sc xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Infocomm</small> , that incorporates locally supervised learning in federated learning. With locally supervised learning, the disadvantages of split learning can be avoided by using a more flexible way to offload training from resource constrained clients to a more capable server. <sc xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Infocomm</small> enables parallel training of different modules of the neural network in both the server and clients in a gradient-isolated fashion. The efficacy in reducing both training time and communication time is supported by our theoretical analysis and empirical results. In the scenario involving larger models and fewer available local data, <sc xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Infocomm</small> has been observed to reduce the elapsed time per round by over 37% without sacrificing accuracy compared to both conventional federated learning or directly combining federated learning and split learning, which showcases the advantages of <sc xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Infocomm</small> under power-constrained IoT scenarios.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.968
Threshold uncertainty score0.384

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.121
GPT teacher head0.395
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it