Photos from home: Integrating lived experience in a remote-learning environment
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, first-year lectures in Biological Anthropology and Archaeology at the University of Toronto Scarborough (UTSC) and Mississauga (UTM) were offered via online asynchronous delivery, which challenged the ability of instructors to interact with students and gauge levels of understanding, interest, and engagement. This teaching brief describes one approach used to connect with students and build community in a remote-learning environment. In a low-stakes assessment, students introduced themselves, specified from where in the world they were learning, and were invited to submit photographs from home. Photos were submitted from all over Asia, Africa, and the Americas, and were integrated into lectures with short discussions on the evolutionary history and significance of these places. This exercise was successful in creating community by integrating student experience directly into course material, emphasizing geographic and cultural diversity, and showcasing this diversity for all students, whether learning on campus or abroad.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it