MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4398206072 · doi:10.4171/jca/88

RoCK blocks for affine categorical representations

2024· article· en· W4398206072 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Combinatorial Algebra · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicRough Sets and Fuzzy Logic
Canadian institutionsPerimeter InstituteUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAffine transformationCategorical variableMathematicsPure mathematicsGeologyAlgebra over a fieldStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Given a categorical action of a Lie algebra, a celebrated theorem of Chuang and Rouquier proves that the blocks corresponding to weight spaces in the same orbit of the Weyl group are derived equivalent, proving an even more celebrated conjecture of Broué for the case of the symmetric group. In many cases, these derived equivalences are t -exact and thus induce equivalences of abelian categories between different blocks. We call two such blocks “Scopes equivalent.” In this paper, we describe how Scopes equivalence classes for any affine categorification can be classified by the chambers of a finite hyperplane arrangement, which can be found through simple Lie theoretic calculations. We pay special attention to the largest equivalence classes, which we call RoCK, and show how this matches with recent work of Lyle on Rouquier blocks for Ariki–Koike algebras. We also provide Sage code that tests whether blocks are RoCK and finds RoCK blocks for Ariki–Koike algebras.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.979
Threshold uncertainty score0.369

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it