MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4398773851 · doi:10.5376/jeb.2024.15.0003

Valorization of Sugarcane By-Products from Waste to Wealth

2024· article· en· W4398773851 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Energy Bioscience · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSugarcane Cultivation and Processing
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusinessWaste managementAgricultural economicsPulp and paper industryBiotechnologyNatural resource economicsEconomicsEngineeringBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The global sugarcane industry shows great potential in the development of sugar, energy and by-products. Sugarcane by-products such as bagasse, molasses and filter mud are converted into biofuels, chemicals and other high value-added products through value-added technology, reducing waste emissions and improving resource recycling. The study points out that sugarcane bagasse and molasses can be used to produce ethanol, biomass energy and a variety of chemicals, while filter mud and sugarcane waste liquid can be used as organic fertilizers and soil amendments. Despite technical, economic and policy challenges, the value-added utilization of sugarcane by-products offers new opportunities for sustainable development through technological innovation and policy support.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.125
Threshold uncertainty score0.113

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it