X Hotine-Marussi Symposium on Mathematical Geodesy
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Italy. This series of symposia focused on theoretical geodesy started in 1959 when Antonio Marussi organized the first Symposium on Three-Dimensional Geodesy in Venice. The name of the symposia was changed in 1965 when the third Symposium on Mathematical Geodesy was held in Torino. The first three symposia were strongly influenced by the prominent British geodesist Martin Hotine. After his death in 1968, the series was renamed again and the first Hotine Symposium on Mathematical Geodesy was held in Trieste, 1969. This symposium and following four symposia were organized by Antonio Marussi. After his death in 1984, the series was renamed to the Hotine-Marussi Symposia, the title used up to now. The first five Hotine-Marussi Symposia (1985, 1989, 1994, 1998 and 2003) were organized by Fernando Sans, the driving force behind the series of Hotine-Marussi symposia over more than three decades.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it